Good morning, everyone. Good morning. I'm Chris Martinson. I will be your emcee for
the day. Very interesting. We have about 100 new people in the room because we had a lot
of providers yesterday. We have people who we would call health enthusiasts, non-providers
have come in for it today and tomorrow. And so welcome them into the room. Welcome everybody
who's brand new coming in. We had an extraordinary day yesterday. I learned so much and I am steeped
in this material all the time and I particularly loved that Suzanne Gazda ended her very voluminous
data-packed presentation with the idea that we should go out, get some sunshine, be in nature
and remember it's all about love. You will not find that at a typical medical gathering. I don't
think, right? And speaking of which, for anybody who wasn't there last night, the FLCCC handed out
awards. So there were four awards handed out. I just want to mention them again here. It's
starting with outstanding clinical scientist Suzanne Gazda, Dr. Gazda. Absolutely deserving.
For contributions to research excellent, Dr. Flavio Cadegania. Just amazing what he's done
for the world. Figuring out poxilutamide, the Itajai Ivermectin trials, unbelievable work
coming out of him. So well-deserved award there. And the Freedom Award for Investigative Journalism
to Mary Beth Pfeiffer. Yay! Hopefully Mary Beth can single-handedly remind her profession what
it's supposed to do. She's doing a great job at that. And then finally a lifetime achievement award
to Dr. Elizabeth Mumper for all of her outstanding work. For those of you who are new and didn't see
yesterday, we have this thing called Slido, which is an app that you can use on your phone to ask
questions. That's how we've been posing questions. If you went to the back page of your pamphlet,
it's the show notes. You'll find a QR code there if you know how to drive those and it'll get you
access in. This is how we're handling questions and so they will be entered in and they go back
to the room's amount and they end up on the screen here. So that's how we'll be handling
questions all day and tomorrow as well. And so I also want to remind people no filming of this
because this is all being filmed and being put out by the FLCCC, but feel free to take pictures.
So parse that. And then we're going to, for those of you here yesterday, we're going to, you know,
there's a big thing going on here and so what we want to be able to do is really drive that home.
So we talked about it yesterday. You're going to hear a little bit of it again this morning
because we want to bring the new people into the conversation because what really matters here is
that we're part of something together and that's what I've been gathering all morning and people
really come to me and reflected that, whether on the provider side, whether on the health
enthusiast side, that we are part of something. And so that takes time to settle in. I know our
organization has been working with it for months and it's still settling in. So I know it takes
time. We want to make sure we give that the space it needs because it's really important
what's happening here. So today we're going to start with...
Oh my goodness. I cannot imagine the past several years without the FLCCC.
It's given me a sense of community because I've felt isolated from mainstream medicine.
What this means to me personally is that as doctors from those communities,
we're not so alone anymore. I have known in sending people to FLCCC that they would get
honest information and that they would be working with people who uphold the fundamental
ethic of medicine and that is first, you know, harm. Over time I started to find a community
of people I could trust and the FLCCC was definitely a very big part of that. The FLCCC
was the place that I went back time and time again. They were the ones who had that knowledge
that I could always rely on. When I learned about the work of FLCCC, it was great that I did not feel
so alone. I want to see the FLCCC continue to be a force for medical freedom in this country
and in the world. I see FLCCC as the new template for medical education and medical learning.
That community grows so that next time this happens, because we know it's going to happen
again, there will be something and I think having that in place and having that community in place
is going to be really important to keep people tied together. Community is everything. Community is
everything. If we can preserve a collaboration and the type of synergy that we have working
with one another, that we'll be able to come up with some good treatment strategies for whatever
the next crisis is. We only change what needs changed if it's grassroots, if it's everybody joining
and doing it the FLCCC way. This is the population of people that is creating
a functional health care system, right, parallel to basically the health care system that has failed
us. This is the battle to try to restore medicine to its original purpose. The louder, the more
powerful our voices are, the greater change we can bring about. Our clinics have been threatened
to be shut down. Our licenses have been threatened to be taken away. I want to see that change.
I want us doctors to feel safe practicing this medicine because when we're safe to practice
this medicine, people, the public will be safe.
So, well said. So, this is what this is about, is trying to figure out how to make this safe again
and to get medicine back to where it used to be, which is a sacred relationship, doctor-patient,
and so there's a lot to be done, a huge amount to be done. I mean, this is, we all know, this is,
how do we fight Goliath in this story, and so we understand that what we're really doing
when we strip it apart is we're leading a movement, and a movement is people going from
point A to point B. Point A in this story is a sick care system that we all know and love,
right? It's designed to make us sick, keep us sick, and then harvest money from us. You can look
at it that way and you'd be forgiven for being that cynical or worse. It's really been awful.
It's gotten way off the rails, and so that has created an enormous push that COVID just put
afterburners on, and so now people are moving towards wellness and being much more proactive,
I'm one of them, in their own health and how they approach health and their own wellness,
and yesterday it was fascinating to see all of these case studies for the people who weren't
here yesterday, case study after case study, people presenting with fatigue and just a whole list,
like the laundry list of presenting symptoms, and in almost every case the resolution was
something like methylene blue, some ivermectin, excuse me, and some other basic items that had
been figured out by the people in this room over time being doctors doing what doctors do, so
excuse me again, this is the movement that we're part of, and so we have to rebuild trust.
That's what got broken, really comprehensively, and rebuilding trust is a series of actions
that are consistent, and you have integrity, and you're reliable, you're competent,
this is what needs to be rebuilt, and I know that in conversations with a lot of you yesterday,
there's this mysteriously baffling large number of people out there in the medical space still who
were doing this, right? How can they still be doing this? How do you look at your 15th sub 30-year
old with a clot and not start to form active questions? How are you even beginning to do your
job at all under that circumstance? So this trust that's been broken, it creates an enormous, these
people need a home. FLCCC, as Kelly will be showing you later, we're trying, we're working very hard
to make a home, and there's a lot of components in a home, so it's a building process, so what
we're really asking for here is a collaboration. This isn't us presenting to you so that you can
see what we're doing, this is us telling you all the things we're doing so we can be in this together.
It's really important. You know, the FLCCC, with their protocols, has already replaced part of
the NIH, which has this odious 428-page NIH COVID treatment guideline, which really, if you printed
it out, would make great fire starter. Possibly, you know. The AMA obviously has fallen way down
in its job. Let's be honest, this place is now just a money harvesting operation that pays its
C-suite obscene amounts of money and does almost nothing, puts nothing back into research and does
very little to advocate for doctors, let alone patients. It's a money, it just got corrupted.
And the CDC don't even get me started, but now that we're here, you know, they are so far off
their mission, it's who even knows where to start, but there must be good people in that
organization still hating their jobs, hating what they're doing, ready for a little breath of life
to come out so that they can be the kind of people they wish they could be, which is people operating
with integrity who are helping. You know, the CDC even still says, you know, you got to limit
saturated fats, they're bad here, take some statins, right? And Paul, Merrick, rebel that he is,
will tell you the exact opposite of these things. Like, how can you be that far apart? Well,
one's relying on data. So it's the how the FLCC goes about doing what it's doing is why I love
seeing the case studies coming out, because that's a showing of how. Here's how you do this. Here's
how you be a good doctor. This is how we learn from each other. And so that's what all the online
forums are going to be. It's just it's a digital way of having that conversation and keeping it
going. And so Kelly can tell you all about that. But first I'm going to bring up a man who really
needs no introduction and he's an astonishing human being. Pierre Corey has done more for, I think
we're all in this room, I think because of Pierre Corey, I am because of because of that one
Senate, you were in front of the Senate, he gave testimony and I saw it and there was something
in his passion and his voice and I could just feel it. I was like that, that's what we're needing
right now. You could feel him advocating angrily, because he couldn't believe how outrageous it was
that what was happening with ivermectin or corticosteroids was happening, but there it was.
So with that, Pierre, come on up and share your great wisdom with all of us.
If you want me to talk for a bit and then we'll switch, get to call next.
Thanks guys.
Yeah, it's been been quite a journey and I would never imagine this, I never would imagine this,
but I don't know, COVID's transformed all of us. When I think about restoring the
patient-physician relationship, before COVID in my career, I could not, I cannot recall any time
I was ever told I couldn't do something. As an attending physician, as a specialist,
certified in three specialties, I really had full autonomy. Whatever I wanted to,
whatever I thought was best for the patient, I could advocate for and I would be supported by
my hospital, by my pharmacy formulary. I would say there's one exception to that, which was
intravenous Tylenol, just because it was so expensive, they had a very close restriction on that.
But if I thought something was reasonable, something that's crazy is giving someone high
doses of IV vitamin C, no one pushed back on me. And then comes COVID and I saw this, well,
I saw part of it and then I got out, but I saw this like rigid transformation of this top-down
control that was unprecedented. And especially during the Ivermectin War, particularly in the
wake of the horse dewormer PR campaign, if you'll remember that one, suddenly you saw
pharmacies across the country in the hospitals removing one of the safest drugs in history
from their formularies and then you saw retail pharmacists across the country refusing to fill.
And then I saw the medical system behaving in such a way and then people were consulting me
and Paul for a year and a half, over 100 consults in the hospital desperate, because their patients
were deteriorating and the doctors would offer them nothing more than the standard remdesivir
in six of decks. And I found that truly shocking because the two principles I taught, and I was
a medical educator, I used to run a training program to teach pulmonary and critical care
physicians. And one of the two things that I always taught my trainees when we were in the ICU
is I said the two guideposts are if what you're doing is working, keep doing what you're doing.
Generally, as soon as you affect a positive trajectory in a critically ill patient,
that trajectory will continue as long you can continue to support them the way that you have.
But conversely, if what you're doing is not working, you got to change what you're doing.
And I saw and heard these stories of patients deteriorating and nothing more was offered.
You know, even something as like ivermectin, which at the time, even if you were wanting to be the
most critical of ivermectin, the evidence was at least uneven. It wasn't saying that was dangerous
and they were trying nothing. They wouldn't increase steroids, they wouldn't add another
repurposed drugs. If you look at our hospital protocol, we have like 11 elements on there
and people would come desperate, ask for the math plus protocol to be given,
and they would be refused. And then if you know, if you guys know the story of Raul Florego, he
started going to court and he took 200 cases where he literally sued hospitals to give dying
patients on ventilators safe repurposed drugs and he had to go to court. And in the beginning,
the judges were totally reasonable. The judges completely understood the argument and they were
giving orders to hospitals to administer one of the safest drugs in history. And initially,
those orders were being followed in the hospital and then the hospital started fighting back.
And I mean, you saw this like Chris says, this Goliath and this rigid control, like you couldn't
even get a judge to get a doctor to give a medicine and the hospitals were bringing out not teams of
lawyers. And then when they would win the order, suddenly the hospital would say, we don't have a
physician on staff who's comfortable writing that order. And then we would get community doctors
like the primary care provider to write the order. And then they would say, we don't have any nurses
that are, you know, comfortable administrating that pill. And then we would have doctors go to
hospitals after long office hours to go in and literally push ivermectin down nasogastric tubes.
I'm probably going too far with that story, but I think it's illustrative of just how crazy it got.
And just if anyone's keeping score, if you want to know what happened with Ralph, so he ended
up getting 200 cases, 80 of them went to court. He won 40 and lost 40. Of the 40 that he won,
two people died. Of the 40 that he lost, 38 died. And so when we talk about restoring the
patient-physician relationship, you know, one of my first conclusions is, and for a few more reasons
than I just told you, but I don't know that it's possible working in a modern American hospital
system. There are these huge corporate consolidated conglomerates, and they have administrators
now dictating what patients can do. And so we've lost physician autonomy. We've lost the ability
to truly consider the risk, benefits, and alternatives of a patient's condition and of
the options for treatment at any given time. Because that's a very fluid thing, especially
in critical care. I mean, things are moving by by the minute and by the hour. Things can change.
They can turn on a dime, patients can crash, and they have to change what you're doing. And so,
but here they were handcuffing doctors, and they were doing it all over the country. And so like
the system is broken. I mean, that that's a different problem than what Chris brought up in
his introduction. And so like, how do we restore that? And, you know, then the other things that
I've now discovered, because I was not aware of the extent of the corruption, but all of these
scientific consensus, like the standard of care, the guidelines for the treatment of a heart attack,
for pneumonia, for anything, you know, they're full of nonsense. You know, they can statins
his first line for every single disease we know, you put someone on a statin. And it's all based
on completely fraudulent science. I was not aware of the immense dangers of SSRIs, we give them out
like candy, you know, and so not only are doctors prohibited from doing and using their critical
thinking and access to all appropriate treatments, but they're fed lies. And I want to be careful here
because I got to tell you, I was also as I was preparing for this talk, I thought of all of the
decades of my colleagues, I got to tell you, there's really good doctors in that system. They're not
all bad. They're really good. The only problem with them was the problem that I had, which is they
don't know that they're being lied to in a 360 degree sphere. They're being told to use things
that have inflated sense of efficacy and hidden toxicity. And if they knew that, I can promise
you they wouldn't do it if they were allowed to not do it, right? And suddenly, if you don't give
someone a statin, they'll look at your charts and they'll say, oh, you know, after a heart attack,
you only have given 80% of your patients statins. They have all these quality standards. And so it's
kind of a rigged game. But I got to tell you, the people inside, they're not bad. They're just being
misled. And now they're being handcuffed. And so, you know, I solved this problem. And I got to say,
thank God we still have private practice in this country. You know, I got out of there. And Scott
and I, we built the most wonderful practice with the most wonderful nurses. And, you know, although,
thank you. Although we have to charge fees, and I'm finding out how expensive it is to deliver
medical care when you have a good, if you want to deliver good medical care, that ain't cheap.
Scott and I do not make a lot of money, but we have to charge a fair amount because we provide
what we try to provide as the most optimal care we can. But what I love about it is we don't have
a boss. We don't have anyone telling us to do anything. We can figure out what we want to do.
We can learn things. We draw from many different disciplines. We collaborate now with a whole
collaborative network of nature pass and osteopaths and chiropractors and all sorts of
practitioners who've used different modalities over the years. And I find it to be one of the most
stimulating and inspiring times of my life. And I wish I could tell my old partners to come on out,
you know, and practice medicine the way it ought to be. And I said, first thing is we have to preserve
private practice. And I also think we have to work on that payment model because people, the way
our insurance structure is, many people can get to me. And I've treated the poor, the people with
no insurance, self-pay, Medicaid, my whole career, I've treated the poor. And now it's very hard to
do that. And I think we do have to figure out a way to deliver that kind of free care. And, you
know, I think they're going to come after us because as private practice grows, as people are
fleeing the system, like, I'm sure everyone in this room, we all have that condition called
hospital phobia, right? Do you guys ever, like, wake up at night, imagine, like, if you got really
sick and needed the hospital, and you'd be like, holy shit, right? And I think, like, we need
mobile ICUs. Like, there are actually that model. Like, I don't know what we got to do. We really
have to figure out how to protect ourselves from that system because it's not going to serve us well.
And, you know, I do think there's an answer. And I think, you know, tomorrow there's a session
where we're going to talk about how to, you know, really how to bring direct patient care practices,
help others to bring them. Because I've got to tell you that's the answer. I've never practiced
medicine so happily in my life. And, you know, we're now even moving into cancer care. Now that
I'm understanding that cancer is actually a lie. I don't know if you guys know that. But it's built
on a scientific paradigm, which is on this somatic mutation model that cancer is caused by genetic
mutations. And when that was decided on 60 years ago, there was an alternative scientific paradigm.
And that one lost. And guess which one was the correct one? The one that got lost. And it's
based on an understanding of cancer as a metabolic problem, which then causes the mutation. So they
have it backwards. And they're using all these cytotoxic therapies, which are not particularly
effective. And you guys have heard all of the case reports of different repurposed drugs that use
metabolic pathways. And you see these incredible recoveries. Well, it's because they got the science
right. And Paul recognized that. And he's been working on that. His cancer care doctor brings
that out. And now we're starting to treat cancer. And so that kind of freedom to look at the data
critically and be able to, like, you think I could try to treat cancer in the system with
repurposed drugs? I lose my job in like two seconds. And so, you know, that's one thought I have,
like, operationally and how to deliver the care. But, you know, really health care and wellness,
I think it's so much of it is information, right? And so the other thing that we're trying to build
is like a home, a community where people can gather, like like-minded practitioners, patients,
lay people, like these communities that we're building, we want that to be a free exchange
of information where we can really learn the best ways we can treat disease and protect our health.
In a way, I mean, I learned so much, we want to expand that brain trust to share everything that
we need to know to keep us healthy and happy. And so much of the things that keep us healthy and
happy are not being told to us. Like, Chris's slides with the dietary recommendations, I mean,
the pyramid in this country, I mean, the stuff that they tell you to do that's going to keep you
well, it's always a pill and then something processed in a bag. And I mean, we live in a toxic
environment. And I think what frees people is information. I think this is, this COVID was
a war of information. And what Paul and I and Joe and Jose and Humberto fought and the rest of the
FLCC team is we saw these lies and we saw insane thinking, you know, stay home till your lids turn
blue. I mean, from the get go, like nobody was making sense. And like Paul always says, and I
always say now, I mean, the world went mad. But the world went mad because they were just
absolutely hammered with terrible information, you know, and they were kept deprived of really
good information, accurate information that was going to save them. Like, hey, the vaccines can
kill you. You might want to know that before you go get a vaccine. And you saw people, you know,
being propagandized, rushing on waiting lines, going to pharmacies to get a toxic gene therapy.
And it's a disaster. I mean, they caused a catastrophe. And so we got to do something,
folks. And the FLCC wants to be part of the solution. And we want to continue to help people.
We're proud of the work we've done. And we're looking forward to the future and helping everyone
gather and continue to stay healthy and protect ourselves and our families. Thank you.
Wow, so well said. Thank you, Pierre. Now I'm going to bring up Paul Merrick, who,
if the FLCC was going to give out an award, it would have to be a triple lifetime achievement
award. Because he's done more in his life scientifically than most people do in many
lifetimes. A ridiculously high H index. He's been enormously influential. And his ability to
read papers and figure out what's true and what's not is really, it's just legendary at this point
in time. So Dr. Merrick, come on up. Thank you.
Thank you. Thanks for being here. So my talk will be really short. I just want to say ditto
to everything at PSZ. That's my talk. So thank you. It's really difficult to know where to start.
I think we're facing this colossal giant that is trying to undermine everything we do,
suppressing the truth and preventing us doing what we need to do. So I think this is a battle
of the minds and we're in this all together. And we can't do this alone. And it's a tragedy,
Pierre and I and most of you were brought up in this healthcare system, which we trusted.
And I think we've now questioned much of what we were taught. And as Dr. Livkin is going to tell us,
you know, most of what we were taught was a lie. And it's a really difficult concept to understand
that, you know, you went to medical school, you went to nursing school, you practiced in medicine,
and yet what the foundation of what you were doing was based on false information. It's a very
disturbing and somewhat humbling. But I think, you know, what we have to do is just recognize that
we were wrong. I think there's nothing, you know, there's nothing wrong with it,
meaning, you know what, we were misled, we were wrong, and now there's a better way forward.
And I think that's what we all have to do. What I still found astounding and speaking to you guys
all the time is that you obviously get it. He wouldn't be otherwise. But there's this massive
people that have been so brainwashed and just can't see the obvious. It's there to be seen.
You know, it's, it's what you can't be blind to all the people dying suddenly. You can't be
blind to all the vaccine injured. You can't be blind to all these young people getting cancer.
But yet people don't want to really see the truth. And so I think, you know, part of our goal is to,
you know, and it's a very difficult conversation to have because people have stopped conversing is
that, I mean, what makes, what separates us from, I'm not sure anymore, but what should separate us
is our ability to have a conversation, to disagree, to figure things out and, and arrive at some kind
of a consensus. But people just don't want to talk about different points of view. And it's always
such an important growth experience, because many of the things Pyrrha and I disagree about. But you
know what, when we talk about it, somehow we can find some common ground. And I think it's really
such an important concept. The cancer journey really, I just want to talk a little bit about it
just because it's, it's, it's so fascinating. And so, you know, I'm an ICU doctor, who would have
thought that somebody who worked in ICU and titrated presses and fluids would write a monograph on
cancer. And so people ask me, why did you do such a thing? You know, you're not an oncologist. And I
said, well, that's the whole point is I'm not an oncologist. So I was able to, you know, see this
objectively. I have no, no skin in the game. And you know, what I've been doing most of my career is
just looking at the data, assimilating the data, putting it together. And, you know, if you have
a preconceived notion or a bias, you're going to see the data through tinted glasses. But I was able
to, you know, look at the literature, look what's out there objectively. And when you do that, it's
astonishing. It's really astonishing. And the, the, you know, peer brought it up a little bit. But
the lie and the fraud that's been perpetuated is truly astonishing. And it's not like there's no
data out there. You know, the monograph was, was based on, you know, 1400 peer reviewed papers.
So the data, you know, supporting what we're talking about is overwhelming. You know, whether
you look at vitamin D, or you look at melatonin, or you look at ivermectin, or you look at mabendazole,
or you look at green tea, or, you know, there's a really long list. There's, there's a lot of data.
But they hide the data. They don't want you to see the data. And so
it's primarily because the system is, it's not a healthcare system has nothing to do with health,
and has nothing to do with caring. And so that's what we need to do, put back the health and the
caring in healthcare. And so that's why I think this is such really such an important initiative,
because certainly they're going to go after us. If they went after us for our treatment of COVID,
you can be sure they're going to go after us. But you know what, we know that we're ready for them.
And, you know, the truth in the science is behind us. So for those who perhaps weren't here yesterday,
what's kind of really exciting is we're actually going to do something somewhat unique. We're going
to prospectively have an observational study looking at repurposed drugs for the treatment of cancer.
There's probably not a single person in this room who is not directly impacted by cancer. So
that's why it becomes such an important topic. And unfortunately, we know with these jabs,
you know, turbo cancer is real. It's not a any fax conspiracy. You know, we hear about all of these
young people with cancer. Pierre saw a 21 year old girl with a brain tumor in her class. There was
a patient, a girl who had a glial blastoma and died in the age of 20. I mean, it's an out,
it's a tragedy. And so, you know, we have to face this. And so, you know, we're going to do what
nobody be, no one else will do. You can hardly see the NIH doing a study looking at the other
mechanism for the treatment of cancer. And that's not going to happen. So, you know, much like
this journey, we're just going to fill the void. So I think this is an exciting project. And I
think it kind of gives a direction of what we at FLCC see as our future and what we're going to do.
We're going to take on these difficult problems. And they can't scare us anymore because we know
the truth is on our side. And our goal is to help patients because ultimately,
that's why we're here. And, you know, as Dr. Ruddy said yesterday, when she speaks to a patient,
you know, it's not a 10 minute interview. She speaks to a patient. And the importance of a
patient-physician relationship is so important because that's a bond that develops between
the patient and the physician. And it's based on trust. And so that's what we're going to build
the FLCC on. And this program, we hope, will be successful. We need you to help us
because we can't do this alone. You know, you guys know people who have cancer,
you know, just try and open their mind. Just have a discussion that there is an alternative
way of doing things. The current paradigm is based on fraud and oncologists are there to
make money. You know, as I showed you yesterday, chemotherapeutic drugs act on various small
population of patients with cancer. Most of them, you know, they cause severe toxicity.
And patients don't know this. You know, they lie to buy their physicians. And patients should
engage in a conversation. They're the boss. Patients need to understand. They need to be
empowered. They're the boss. They should have a conversation with their physician. And they
should be the ones that decide on the care. If patients can't have a conversation with their
physician, they need to fire their physician and get a physician that they can talk with. Because
I think that's so fundamental in medicine and in honest medicine is honesty, truth, and medicine.
So I want to all thank you. You know, we can't do this alone. You know, the enthusiasm is
overwhelming. And we thank you all. But we need you to be our warriors that we can, you know,
spread the word. And, you know, we need your help in getting our study off the ground. So,
thank you kindly.
Before we turn to some Q&A very quickly, we know there's a Wi-Fi issue for anybody asking. The
hotel is working on it. And they're trying to reboot things. So it's not you. It's them. Just
why don't you know that? So how do we do this? And you talked about the importance of collaboration,
Paul. And we're trying to open up this new collaborative framework here. And I think one of
the more important things that I've noticed that happened to me, and I know you guys had
similar experiences, were these emails that would come in from people, right? Telling you
what happened in their treatment or something in the success stories. And you mentioned yesterday,
Pierre, that it's observational medicine, isn't it? Right? As it should be. So the question is,
how do we begin to bring that back and put that back together? So here we are with the FLCC. We
got a community that we're starting to stitch together online. And again, that's just, it is a
way. But what are the ways that you think, what are the next steps here?
Well, I mean, I think we're going to continue operating as we have, which is this is a program
of attraction, not promotion, meaning people are coming to us. I think they saw what we did,
and I think they're going to continue to come to us for answers. And I think we're going to try to
keep providing guidance. And I think we need to build a community and a larger community. Like Paul
said, you know, there's so many people out there who don't really know what's going on. They don't
understand that they're not being presented the truth or sound guidance in really critical areas,
which impacts their health, their life, that of their family. I mean, I'm going to start with the
vaccine schedule and all of that. And for some reason, they seem resistant to listening to
other viewpoints. And I think as our numbers grow, you know, you know, when I talk to people,
like even like, like Mary Holland and like Dell Big Tree and, you know, folks in the
medical freedom movement didn't hear for a while. I mean, these people are ecstatic that, you know,
Dell will say, we are winning. We are winning. I mean, he's never seen this kind of outpouring,
this kind of mass awakening. And I think it's going to be a journey. And I think it's going
to be a winning journey. But we want to build a home for people to come to to get sound medical,
you know, because some of those organizations like CHD admittedly, that's really a legal
organization. And that's why Mary yesterday, she said she's so happy to partner with us because
we're providing the medical guidance. And I think it's collaboration and with this movement to
create a community and a home for people to come to. And I think I hope our numbers grow. And
like Paul said, you know, does the truth still come out? It's guaranteed to come out?
Yeah, I mean, I think eventually. Okay. Yeah. And so for me, what is, you know, I was a tenured
professor of medicine, the only one in my department. And I believe the story, I believe the narrative.
And it's really embarrassing for me now to admit that, you know, Pierre and I, you know, we just
touch rated fluids and presses. And that's what we did. We were happy. But the rest of the system,
you know, is based on fraud. And you go across the board, you know, I, as you probably know,
I was a type two diabetic. The current narrative is it's a progressive disease. It's treated with
expensive pharmacological products. You're going to get complications. You're going to lose your
legs, you're going to lose your vision and you're going to die. That's the medical narrative. But
it's completely false. And it's based on what they want you to believe. What they don't tell you is
it's a completely reversible, treatable disease that doesn't involve expensive pharmacological
products. And so that's just one example of the fraud that's perpetuated. I mean, it goes,
and many of you have come up and spoken to me about intermittent fasting, which is such a cool
thing to do. And it turns around, you know, multiple things. I mean, as Dr. Gazda will tell you,
one of the best ways, who wants to become demented? None of us. We want to live a healthy life and
then drop dead. We don't want to live a life of disease and suffering. I think that's what I'm
most about. Our goal is to, you know, live healthy, enjoy your life. Once it's done, it's done. You
don't want to live a life of suffering. And then the numerous things that, that, that people can do.
Pierre's taking medicine to improve his lifespan. Are you not, Pierre? Okay, I'm not allowed to
mention it. But yes, I am. I, they're safe medicines that I think will make me vibrant and
live long. I mean, you can see how he's become so trim and slim and handsome. It's really astonishing.
So there are things that we can do. And then, you know, there's, you know, I had a little
conversation with Dr. Mumper and about the whole, the whole issue of psychiatry and how many people
are on SSRIs and how, how many people are harmed by SSRIs. And so this is, that's what happens. You
go to your general practitioner. You can't sleep. You're feeling a bit down. He doesn't ask you why
you can't sleep or why are you feeling down? He puts you on an SSRI and then you have all of these
host of complications and then he puts you on another SSRI or increases the dose and then
you go kill someone. I don't know if you know this, that, that SSRIs have a black box warning
as one of the side effects of an SSRI is homicide. Actually, can you imagine such a thing? The FF,
the FDA knows this. There's a whole database of people that took an SSRI, completely lost their
mind and killed people. It's a known complication of SSRIs and yet it's a drug that's promoted all
the time. So it's really a broken system. And so you go across the board of chronic diseases
and you realize how we've been fooled. Dr. Lifkin's going to give us a lecture on
the lies he taught at medical school. And so we were the recipients of those lies and it's not
just us, it's all healthcare workers. And so we have to look for the truth and the answer is often
quite simple. It's not complicated pharmacological drugs. What more can one say?
Well, we're really hoping that, again, we build that community. We need more providers to join us,
more providers to understand and we need to be able to connect them with you and have a place
where you can get good sound guidance free of conflicts of interest. The problem is everyone
is incentivized in that system in some way or another by money. And it's not that being incentivized
by money is necessarily a bad thing, but it's very powerful interest that makes sure that those
incentives are baked in and that they are really profiting. And so we need a new system and we need
to continue building. And I really hope that you guys find what we're building in these online
communities. There's a whole variety of them and I hope that you guys find them to be a place where
some of these problems can be solved. One of my favorite things that I've heard in my journey,
because we do get a lot of thanks and appreciation and I love that. I never get tired of hearing that.
But I remember somebody came up to me once and she just said, she said, you guys
were the only ones making sense. You were an island of sanity in a sea of insanity.
And, you know, I didn't know we were doing that. I did know that everyone was losing their mind,
but at least so I thought. But, you know, I want to continue to do that and continue to build that
island and we need more people there. And I hope that we continue to grow this move. And I have
another funny anecdote. I just said that was my favorite appreciation, you know, the island of
sanity comment. Actually, that was topped yesterday. I had to pee. So I went to the bathroom. I ran
into Matt Isaacs, our first donor, who gave us, I think, $5,000 in his first gift.
Let's get the story. It's a good story. You're Matt in the bathroom?
Yeah. Can I finish? Yeah, we're just a bit anxious of what you were up to in the bathroom.
So I was talking to Matt in the bathroom. That's one of my favorites. He helped pay off that credit
card that you guys weren't helping me pay off in the beginning. Anyway, so I say, I load Matt and
then I go to the urinal and I start to urinate. And someone comes next to me and there's a little
shield bearer between us, you know, and he starts to pee and he says, I got to tell you,
it's an absolute honor to pee next to you. So it's not just the SSRIs that lead to
homicidal thoughts. It's reading FDA tweets. If there are any questions,
they can go up on the screen. You could bring those up. But I have one that came old school
Slido. Thank you for this. Sort of untap. Yeah. Is type one diabetes reversible?
So that's a really good question. So type one and type two are completely different.
Type one is an autoimmune disease in which you have destruction of the beta cells of the pancreas.
So it's very different. But I think the current dietary guidelines for type one diabetes are
completely and utterly insane. We have some endocrinologists in the audience and they could
help us. But there's no reason that a low carb type of diet shouldn't apply to type one diabetics
because diabetics can't deal with glucose. So I think that the whole dietary guidelines,
you know, big food and big pharma are in collaboration with each other. They're all dishonest.
And so big food is involved in this completely fraudulent scheme. So type one diabetes is
obviously a difficult problem. You know, the incidence of type one diabetes is going up.
We know that it's an autoimmune disease. We know that the spike antigen and this mimic
antigenic mimicry causes cross reactive antibodies. So there is a there is a link between them.
I would say, Paul, I don't know, Flavio is here. But I consulted Flavio on a young woman who got
essentially type one diabetes after I think it was either COVID or the vaccine.
And he has a protocol of very high dose vitamin D and hydroxychloroquine and he really addresses
that autoimmune component. And I think he's been successful in a number of cases with.
Yeah, I think what P.S. says is true. It's an autoimmune disease. And so there are
many nutraceutical and other interventions which deal with autoimmune diseases decreases
inflammation. But the question is a good one, type one and type two are already different animals.
Well, we're out of time, but I have to know the answer to this because one of my fantasies,
I wake up RFK junior has won the presidency points, Pierre, head of the FDA and Paul,
head of the NIH, you know, and we carry on. The question is from Matthew Halma. What policy
prescriptions would you make if you were appointed czar of health care? Super easy answer.
Everything that Bobby says. And I'll borrow some of my favorite thing that I've heard Bobby says,
he said in an interview once he said, this is particularly hits my heart and especially in
the war and I've never met him. But he said one of his first actions in office is he would invite
the editors of all of the high impact medical journals into the Oval Office and he would threaten
them with Rico unless they clean up their act. And I think that would be one first step of many.
The second is you have to restructure the leadership of the agencies. You can't have
Fauci sitting atop the biomedical industrial complex with immense tentacles of power throughout
all of the agencies. You need, I think, again, I'm not a policy guy, but these are just things
that have made sense to me intuitively. But you need more of a diverse committee with independent
community members, priests. I don't know. You need really a diverse committee to run those agencies.
I mean, you cannot have this direct influence where everyone's career, that revolving door,
and everything. You need people making decisions that don't have skin in the game that can really
look at something soberly, objectively, transparently. I mean, you look at these ASIP committees,
I mean, they're an effing joke. They're a joke. I mean, you know, watching that train wreck of
when they started to approve the vaccines for 12 to 18, and then six to 12, and then they were going
down to six to five, and I was just like, oh my God, I can't watch this. And then all over the news,
they've approved the vaccines for six months old. You know, it's like, you're seeing these
rubber stand committees and they're unanimous, unanimous. A couple of votes, there was like
two dissenters. Yeah, it's like, if you vote no, there's your career. I mean, you see how the
structure is. I mean, 21 to zero, the top experts in their fields, and they somehow come to the
communal conclusion that we should give these experimental gene therapies to six months old.
I mean, we can't have that. You cannot have that kind of decision making,
and in the amount of influence. And I think Bobby has really smart, well thought out ideas on how
to mitigate that influence and put non sociopaths in charge also. That would be another good policy
prescription. So I think what Pierce says is true. I mean, we have to restructure the
agencies. The first one would be a sociopath test, and we have to get rid of all the sociopaths,
because they seem to be running the agencies. Secondly, you have to take away the conflict
of interest. There, you know, it has to be strict rules about conflicts of interest,
and the revolving door has to stop. I mean, these people get trained in big pharma that go to the
FDA, they then go from the FDA back to big pharma. It's a racket, and it has to stop, and
Congress has to, you know, have the power just to stop this, because unless the agencies are
restructured, you know, we screwed. I mean, it's just the way it is. Agreed. All right. Thank you,
both. Thank you. Thank you, everyone.
you
